Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/14/1998

United States v. Davis

Citations

48 M.J. 494
1998 CAAF LEXIS 778
1998 WL 830640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
sentence reassessment involves ensuring “the sentence is no greater than that which would have been imposed if the prejudicial error had not been committed”
sentence reassessment reviewed for abuse of discretion or obvious miscarriage of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.