Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 8/11/2015
United States v. Quick
Citations
- 74 M.J. 332
- 2015 CAAF LEXIS 703
- 2015 WL 4745001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting in the context of the authority of Courts of Criminal Appeals to order sentence- only rehearings that “it is difficult to quantify the expecta- tions of servicemembers”
- noting in the context of the authority of Courts of Criminal Appeals to order sentence- only rehearings that “it is difficult to quantify the expecta- tions of servicemembers”
- noting in the context of the authority of Courts of Criminal Appeals to order sentence- only rehearings that “it is difficult to quantify the expecta- tions of servicemembers”
- noting in the context of the authority of Courts of Criminal Appeals to order sentence- only rehearings that “it is difficult to quantify the expecta- tions of servicemembers”
- explaining the doctrine of stare decisis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Erdmann, Ryan, Bak, Stucky, Ohlson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. UriosteguiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-09-29· cited 10×
- United States v. LasterNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-01-27
- United States v. MangahasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2018-02-06
- United States v. BlanksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2018-02-28
- United States v. QuickNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-03-30
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2018-05-22
- United States v. CollinsAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-07-23
- United States v. LewisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2020-08-17
- United States v. CauseyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2022-03-23
- United States v. HasanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2023-09-06
- United States v. HasanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2024-03-04
- United States v. DriskillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2024-03-04
- United States v. GrijalvaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2024-06-26
- United States v. DAQUARIES ROBINSONArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-09-04
- United States v. HOKONavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-12-10
Cites
96 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-08-18· cited 1,442×
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 1,000×
- Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court· 1985-06-04· cited 898×
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-09-30· cited 860×
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 815×
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-08-30· cited 752×
- United States v. WinckelmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2013-12-18· cited 706×
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 589×
- United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2010-07-27· cited 526×
- Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Florida Nursing Home Ass'nSupreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 446×
- United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-04-03· cited 334×
- United States v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-06-15· cited 272×
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-02-17· cited 254×
- United States v. BaierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2005-01-03· cited 206×
- Jackson v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1957-07-08· cited 112×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.