United States v. William E. Welliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• repeated usurpation of the questioning of witnesses transmits a notion that the trial judge believes the accused to be guilty
• evidence that bank president loaned funds without securing a legally binding obligation for repayment sufficient to prove § 656 violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).