United States v. Donald Steffen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the court should have continued trial when defendant had not properly requested a continuance, nor “alleged any facts which would constitute plain error or abuse of discretion in the court’s not ordering a continuance sua sponte”
• custom and practice in the banking business may be relevant to intent in a misapplication of bank funds prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).