Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 12/15/2011

United States v. Werlein

Citations

  • 664 F.3d 1143
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24845
  • 2011 WL 6221798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no Tapia violation when district court referenced the need for treatment in the context of explaining the defendant’s risk to public safety
  • “no plain Tapia error occurs where a district court never expresses an intention to lengthen a defendant’s sentence for rehabilitative purposes” (cleaned up)
  • considering the context of the district court’s statements about treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, and Benton, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.