United States v. Werlein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Tapia violation when district court referenced the need for treatment in the context of explaining the defendant’s risk to public safety
• “no plain Tapia error occurs where a district court never expresses an intention to lengthen a defendant’s sentence for rehabilitative purposes” (cleaned up)
• considering the context of the district court’s statements about treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).