N.D. Iowa· 2/24/2009
United States v. Beiermann
Citations
- 599 F. Supp. 2d 1087
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14316
- 2009 WL 467628
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting “entirely” on “categorical, policy grounds” the child pornography Guidelines before examining particular circumstances of defendant and his offenses
- sentencing defendant to 90 months after \reweighing\ and \cherry picking\ Guidelines factors
- sentencing defendant to 90 months after “reweighing” and “cherry picking” Guidelines factors
- finding defendant’s crimes to be “very serious,” but varying downward because the sentence prescribed by the child pornography Guidelines “would be at odds with the ‘parsimony provision’ of the federal sentencing statute”
- finding defendant’s crimes to be “very serious,” but varying downward because the sentence -16- prescribed by the child pornography Guidelines “would be at odds with the ‘parsimony provision’ of the federal sentencing statute”
- noting “the principal or only reason given by the Commission itself for each of the amendments [to the child pornography guidelines] is that the amendment was undertaken exclusively or primarily at the behest of Congress”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mark W. Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. BrooksSixth Circuit· 2011-01-06· cited 173×
- United States v. MillerFifth Circuit· 2011-12-13· cited 131×
- United States v. GroberThird Circuit· 2010-10-26· cited 91×
- United States v. WerleinEighth Circuit· 2011-12-15· cited 31×
- United States v. GullyN.D. Iowa· 2009-05-18· cited 26×
- United States v. Donna Mary ZaunerEighth Circuit· 2012-08-16· cited 19×
- United States v. HayesN.D. Iowa· 2013-06-07· cited 19×
- United States v. McElheneyE.D. Tennessee· 2009-07-02· cited 13×
- United States v. R.V.E.D. New York· 2016-01-21· cited 11×
- United States v. NawannaN.D. Iowa· 2018-05-01· cited 10×
- United States v. NewhouseN.D. Iowa· 2013-01-30· cited 8×
- United States v. CruikshankS.D. West Virginia· 2009-11-06· cited 5×
- United States v. JacobN.D. Iowa· 2009-06-26· cited 5×
- United States v. AmayaN.D. Iowa· 2013-06-11· cited 5×
- United States v. RileyS.D. Florida· 2009-09-04· cited 3×
- United States v. AbrahamD. Nebraska· 2013-05-15· cited 3×
- United States v. JohnsonM.D. Alabama· 2019-05-09· cited 2×
- United States v. McCrackenW.D. Virginia· 2009-11-05
- United States v. JeffersN.D. Iowa· 2015-09-30
- United States v. AlmazanN.D. Iowa· 2012-12-03
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 7,739×
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 3,379×
- United States v. Darrin Todd HaackEighth Circuit· 2005-04-13· cited 681×
- Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 508×
- Nelson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 194×
- United States v. RobersonEighth Circuit· 2008-02-07· cited 123×
- United States v. BetcherEighth Circuit· 2008-07-22· cited 93×
- United States v. KaneEighth Circuit· 2009-01-14· cited 75×
- United States v. BattiestEighth Circuit· 2009-01-26· cited 73×
- United States v. HensonEighth Circuit· 2008-11-24· cited 66×
- United States v. BairdD. Nebraska· 2008-01-11· cited 36×
- United States v. Esteban RiveraEighth Circuit· 2006-03-06· cited 33×
- United States v. HernandezEighth Circuit· 2008-03-10· cited 33×
- United States v. HansonE.D. Wisconsin· 2008-06-20· cited 31×
- United States v. ShipleyS.D. Iowa· 2008-06-19· cited 27×
- United States v. SternN.D. Ohio· 2008-12-19· cited 23×
- United States v. FiorellaN.D. Iowa· 2009-02-11· cited 14×
- United States v. JohnsonS.D. Iowa· 2008-12-04· cited 14×
Other cases named United States v. Beiermann
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.