United States v. Kiderlen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “key inquiry” is “whether the accused was made sufficiently aware of his right to have counsel and of the possible consequences of a decision to forgo the aid of counsel.”
• “[n]either the Supreme Court nor this court . . . has adopted the Von Molke plurality opinion in all of its particulars”
• “in the real-world circumstance where a sentencing judge agrees with Congress, then the resulting sentence is also probably within the range of reasonableness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).