· 12/24/2013
United States v. Wei Lin
Citations
- 738 F.3d 1082
- 2013 WL 6768104
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting an interpretation of one statutory provision that “would leave no work to be done by” another
- the fraudulent use of a driver’s license did not establish a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) because it is not the type of document enumerated in the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, Fisher, Watford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.