· 11/1/2000
United States v. Chung Lo
Citations
- 231 F.3d 471
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8779
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11691
- 55 Fed. R. Serv. 1349
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27218
- 2000 WL 1634233
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant forfeited the affirmative defense of statute of limitations by not raising it at trial
- affirming mail fraud convictions for mailings sent after illegally obtained loan proceeds were received by the defendant
- requiring less precision a for conspiracy charge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Thomas, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.