Skip to main content
· 11/1/2000

United States v. Chung Lo

Citations

  • 231 F.3d 471
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8779
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11691
  • 55 Fed. R. Serv. 1349
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27218
  • 2000 WL 1634233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant forfeited the affirmative defense of statute of limitations by not raising it at trial
  • affirming mail fraud convictions for mailings sent after illegally obtained loan proceeds were received by the defendant
  • requiring less precision a for conspiracy charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Thomas, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.