Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/10/2009

United States v. Krstic

Citations

  • 558 F.3d 1010
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5374
  • 2009 WL 595552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, based on statutory history and “common sense,” that Paragraph 1 “prohibits possessing an otherwise authentic document that one knows has been procured by means of a false claim or statement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Graber, Bybee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Krstic

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.