United States v. Meghdadi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was error for a military judge to deny a pre- authentication request for an Article 39 session to present evidence in support of a request for a new trial
• explaining that one of the purposes of a post-trial Article 4 United States v. Lofton, No. 10-0565/AF 39(a) session is to discover and preserve “evidence at the earliest possible time . . . while still relatively fresh in the witness’ memory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).