United States v. Jose Ramon Hernandez, United States of America v. Douglas Gorbea Del-Valle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[p]rosecutors are free to ask the jury to make reasonable inferences from the evidence submitted at trial”
• explaining that it is not an appellate court's role \to resolve conflicts in the evidence\
• explaining that \[p]rosecutors are free to ask the jury to make reasonable inferences from the evidence submitted at trial\
• “That the name of the consignee was fabricated” supported the conclusion that the defendant knew the container’s contents.
• knowledge of all details of a drug transaction not needed for aiding and abetting liability
• evasive maneuvers during delivery, e.g., unnecessary u-turns and driving without headlights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).