UNITED STATES v. WADE THOMAS, —

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecutor's statements were not misconduct causing substantial prejudice where the district judge provided an immediate curative instruction
• holding that the prosecutor’s statements were not 18 misconduct causing substantial prejudice where the district judge 19 provided an immediate curative instruction
• noting that the use of the word “lied” more than once on summation, in connection with the defendant, does not constitute severe misconduct
• recognizing role of trial court’s judgment as to curative instructions
• recognizing role of trial court’s judgment as to curative instructions
• upholding conviction for travel fraud and “refusing] to accept the notion that the legality of a defendant’s conduct would depend on his fortuitous choice of a gullible victim,” id. at 243 (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).