Skip to main content
· 3/25/1988

United States v. Vincent Scartz

Citations

  • 838 F.2d 876
  • 1988 WL 7525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that § 1029(a)(1) requires proof that use of the access device “in some way affected interstate commerce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Wellford, Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.