Third Circuit· 7/22/1991
United States v. Vincent Ezeiruaku
Citations
- 936 F.2d 136
- 1991 WL 105684
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he logical fallacy of dicto simpliciter (fallacy of accident) [] occurs when a general rule is applied to exceptional circumstances.”
- “[Ejvery circuit that has considered the question has ruled that the rationales for the ‘border exception’ apply both to incoming and outgoing persons and instrumentalities”
- “[T]he traditional rationale for the border search Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830 , 834 (2d Cir. 19 80
- no individual suspicion required for search of luggage at border
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stapleton, Scirica, Aldisert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bradley v. United StatesThird Circuit· 2002-07-25· cited 104×
- United States v. Daniel OriakhiFourth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 101×
- United States v. James S. Hill, Jr., James HillThird Circuit· 1992-06-22· cited 85×
- United States v. Patrick CogginsThird Circuit· 1993-03-01· cited 82×
- United States v. Ali BoumelhemSixth Circuit· 2003-08-12· cited 51×
- United States v. Willa M. JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 1993-04-20· cited 40×
- United States v. BerasFirst Circuit· 1999-07-07· cited 38×
- United States v. Carl HillstromThird Circuit· 1993-03-12· cited 33×
- United States v. Robert Alexander BestThird Circuit· 2002-09-18· cited 30×
- United States v. RobertsFifth Circuit· 2001-12-04· cited 25×
- State v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-07-09· cited 24×
- Aycock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-09· cited 19×
- United States v. OdutayoFifth Circuit· 2005-04-12· cited 17×
- In Re Forfeiture of $171,900District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-20· cited 12×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-05-28· cited 8×
- United States v. Steven BaxterThird Circuit· 2020-02-21· cited 6×
- United States v. RobertsS.D. Texas· 2000-02-24· cited 5×
- United States v. KolsuzE.D. Virginia· 2016-05-05· cited 5×
- DAVIS AND MOSS v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-03· cited 3×
- Garcia v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-01-31· cited 2×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 982×
- United States v. RamseySupreme Court· 1977-06-06· cited 663×
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court· 1974-04-01· cited 622×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
- United States v. Ernesto J. Benevento, Ernest A. Benevento, Earl A. Keller, and Carmine LoiaconoSecond Circuit· 1987-12-18· cited 113×
- United States v. GlasserThird Circuit· 1984-12-27· cited 106×
- United States v. Maria Vega-BarvoEleventh Circuit· 1984-04-16· cited 84×
- United States v. Paul AjlounySecond Circuit· 1980-08-29· cited 79×
- United States v. Don Bruce DuncanNinth Circuit· 1982-12-03· cited 79×
- Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court· 1978-05-22· cited 79×
- United States v. Carol Asbury and John BruceSecond Circuit· 1978-11-13· cited 77×
- United States v. Michael Paul UdofotEighth Circuit· 1983-08-11· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.