United States v. James S. Hill, Jr., James Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in light of the special needs of a parole system, the warrant requirement does not apply to searches of parolees
• concluding that a warrantless search of a parolee's business one day after his arrest and incarceration did not violate the Fourth Amendment
• holding that in light of the special needs of a parole system, the warrant requirement does not apply to searches of parolees
• holding that it is reasonable to allow a parole officer to conduct a search whenever he reasonably believes that is necessary to perform his duties, as long as the search is based on specific facts
• determining warrantless search of a parolee's business one day after his arrest and incarceration did not violate the Fourth Amendment
• extending Griffin to warrantless search of a parolee’s residence based on probable cause, even though no statutory or regulatory framework exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).