United States v. Victor Guy Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that delivery to the U.S. Marshal satisfied the IADA where the detainer erroneously instructed the prisoner to return the speedy trial demand to the Marshal
• delivery of prisoner’s request for disposition to marshal service constituted delivery to United States Attorney, and public defender’s letter to court sufficient notice under Agreement
• “Under Fex, it does not matter what the prisoner may or may not have done in an attempt to cause such delivery. ... Until actual delivery occurred, the 180-day period did not start to run.”
• “Under Fex, it does not matter what the prisoner may or may not have done in an attempt to cause such delivery . . . . Until actually delivery occurred, the 190-day period did not start to run.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).