Skip to main content
· 7/23/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin James COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 90 F.3d 1420
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 8821
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5419
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18147
  • 1996 WL 409169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[i]t was not clearly erroneous to infer that the pistol had some emboldening role” in the defendant’s attempted burglary
  • finding the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting 13 rebuttal evidence of burglary to counter the adverse party’s evidence
  • applying section (h)(1)(F) [then (H)] to travel to and from state court proceedings
  • applying the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act to determine when a petitioner is “unable to stand trial” under the IADA and tolling the clock for “any delay resulting from any proceeding including other trials” (internal quotation omitted)
  • admission of evidence of attempts to induce witnesses to lie was proper on felon in possession charge
  • defendant convicted of being a felon in possession of firearm received enhancement pursuant for possession of a firearm in 19 connection with attempted burglary of check cashing business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Trott, Ezra

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.