Skip to main content
· 9/17/2008

United States v. Vanvliet

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 259
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20483
  • 2008 WL 4225996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Brasfield’s per se reversal rule applies when the trial court inquiries into the deadlocked jury’s numerical division, but does not apply when, like in this case, the jury reveals its division to the court voluntarily
  • \The prosecutor is entitled to considerable latitude in summation to argue the evidence and any reasonable inferences that can be drawn from that evidence.\ (quoting United States v. Werme, 939 F.2d 108, 117 (3d Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Howard, Diclerico

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.