United States v. Uzzell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss Section 1983 claims for lack of personal involvement where defendants allegedly “were … involved in the decision-making process” for discipline
• “The [state and federal fair employment] agencies have a work sharing arrangement providing that a charge filed with one is deemed cross-filed with the other.”
• Simple or general allegations of discrimination in an . . . IDHR charge are not a sufficient predicate for bringing any discrimination theory in federal court.”
• “scope of the charge” challenges are appropriate at the dismissal stage
• “scope of the charge” challenges are appropriate at the dismissal stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).