A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[t]he matter would stand differently if [the plaintiff] had proceeded with diligence within the 3-year period by suing those conspirators known to him at the time, and later sought to add other participants whose identity he learned in the course of that suit”
• finding no equitable tolling because appellant knew of the material facts
• statute of limitations not tolled during civil service appeal because wrong had been done at time of discharge from employment, although extent of injury became clear only after appeal
• plaintiff not limited to Privacy Act claim when pursuing damages under Fifth Amendment
• plaintiff not limited to Privacy Act claim when pursuing damages under Fifth Amendment
• defendant refused to promote plaintiff “for ... other reasons unrelated to the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).