· 3/31/2003
Hinton v. Shaw Pittman Potts & Trowbridge
Citations
- 257 F. Supp. 2d 96
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5172
- 2003 WL 1740348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the defendant’s criminal conviction barred re-litigation of the same issue in a civil action
- “A criminal conviction is conclusive proof and operates as an estoppel on the defendants as to the facts supporting the conviction in a subsequent civil action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.