United States v. Tucson D. Redd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court will reverse a denial of a requested continuance only upon a showing of a prejudicial abuse of discretion
• assuming without deciding that a defendant can raise a challenge to the district court’s denial of defense counsel’s motion to withdraw
• upholding district court’s implicit findings with regard to balancing test for “documentary hearsay evidence”
• upholding district court’s implicit findings with regard to balancing test for “documentary hearsay evidence”
• “[T]his opinion should not be read as a general endorsement or rejection of sweat patch technology.”
• “Documentary hearsay evidence generally provides greater indicia of reliability than oral hearsay. This distinction is reflected in numerous long-standing exceptions to the hearsay rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).