D.C. Circuit· 3/19/2004

United States v. Stanfield, David C.

Citations

360 F.3d 1346
360 U.S. App. D.C. 305
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5251
2004 WL 536315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding a request to subpoena a hearsay declarant insufficiently specific to count as an objection
finding district court’s failure to conduct balancing test was harmless error; probation officer’s hearsay testimony was largely repetitive of evidence already admitted into the record without objection
district court’s failure to balance parolee’s right to confrontation against government’s articulation of good cause was harmless error; hearsay evidence was largely duplicative of evidence already in the record without objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Garland, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.