United States v. Stanfield, David C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a request to subpoena a hearsay declarant insufficiently specific to count as an objection
• finding district court’s failure to conduct balancing test was harmless error; probation officer’s hearsay testimony was largely repetitive of evidence already admitted into the record without objection
• district court’s failure to balance parolee’s right to confrontation against government’s articulation of good cause was harmless error; hearsay evidence was largely duplicative of evidence already in the record without objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).