Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1/31/2000
United States v. Tualla
Citations
- 52 M.J. 228
- 2000 CAAF LEXIS 13
- 2000 WL 121800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that lower courts are bound by decisions of superior courts
- recognizing that lower courts are bound by decisions of superior courts
- discussing the authority of the 9 United States v. Gaddis, No. 10-0512/AR President to amend the Manual for Courts-Martial in the aftermath of judicial decisions
- “[a]dhering to precedent is usually the wise policy” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[a]dhering to precedent is usually the wise policy” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “Executive acquiescence is entitled to considerable weight in view of the relative ease with which the Manual [for Courts-Martial] can be amended.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Effron, Crawford, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named United States v. Tualla
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. TuallaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-01-27· cited 7×
- United States v. TuallaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-03-01· cited 5×
- United States v. TuallaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 2000-06-06
- United States v. TuallaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-03-01
- United States v. TuallaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-01-27
- United States v. TuallaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 2000-06-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.