Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1/31/2000

United States v. Tualla

Citations

52 M.J. 228
2000 CAAF LEXIS 13
2000 WL 121800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that lower courts are bound by decisions of superior courts
recognizing that lower courts are bound by decisions of superior courts
discussing the authority of the 9 United States v. Gaddis, No. 10-0512/AR President to amend the Manual for Courts-Martial in the aftermath of judicial decisions
“[a]dhering to precedent is usually the wise policy” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“[a]dhering to precedent is usually the wise policy” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“Executive acquiescence is entitled to considerable weight in view of the relative ease with which the Manual [for Courts-Martial] can be amended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Effron, Crawford, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Tualla

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.