United States v. Vassilios K. Handakas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement “generally controls”
• remanding for pronouncement when the challenged condition had been previously properly imposed at the defendant’s original sentencing
• remanding “for the limited purpose of affording [the defendant] an opportunity to contest the occupational restriction. Whether after such opportunity the restriction should be reimposed will be within the District Court’s discretion.”
• “[W]e permitted the later inclusion of conditions listed as ‘mandatory’ or ‘standard’ in subsections 5D1.3(a) and (c) of the Sentencing Guidelines.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).