United States v. Timothy Lloyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the extent to which jury is exposed to extraneous information is a factor in determining prejudice
• relying, in part, on district court’s jury instructions in concluding that there was no prejudice resulting from jury’s exposure to extraneous information
• discussing jurors’ exposure to extraneous influences via third-party contacts and media reports
• identifying as factors the relationship of extraneous information to jury's findings, extent of the jury's exposure, timing of the jury's receipt of the extraneous information, length and structure of jury deliberations, and content of jury instructions
• emphasizing consideration of objective, not subjective, impact on hypothetical average juror
• “We have further recognized that a heavy volume of incriminating evidence also can undermine a claim of prejudice.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).