Third Circuit· 10/12/2001

United States v. Timothy Lloyd

Citations

269 F.3d 228
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21777
2001 WL 1217049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the extent to which jury is exposed to extraneous information is a factor in determining prejudice
relying, in part, on district court’s jury instructions in concluding that there was no prejudice resulting from jury’s exposure to extraneous information
discussing jurors’ exposure to extraneous influences via third-party contacts and media reports
identifying as factors the relationship of extraneous information to jury's findings, extent of the jury's exposure, timing of the jury's receipt of the extraneous information, length and structure of jury deliberations, and content of jury instructions
emphasizing consideration of objective, not subjective, impact on hypothetical average juror
“We have further recognized that a heavy volume of incriminating evidence also can undermine a claim of prejudice.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Rendell, Fuentes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.