United States v. Lawson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Attorney General's opinion was persuasive \[i]n the absence of any South Carolina law to the contrary\
• holding on direct appeal that prejudice was presumed when juror conducted internet research on Wikipedia for definition of terms which were elements of offense
• stating that the court is “troubled by Wikipedia’s lack of reliability”
• considering the strength of the evidence in “determining whether the government has rebutted this presumption of prejudice”
• considering the strength of the evidence in “determining whether the government has rebutted this presumption of prejudice”
• considering the strength of the evidence in “determining whether the government has rebutted this presumption of prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).