Skip to main content
· 5/17/1994

United States v. Time

Citations

  • 21 F.3d 635
  • 1994 WL 189166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that no new trial was warranted when defendant had reason to believe that witness possessed information but failed to cross- examine him at trial
  • finding lack of due diligence where defendant knew of information and had opportunity to investigate matter further

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Jolly, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.