United States v. Thomas J. Sullivan H.J. Sallee, \Mickey\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• phrasing the question for review in a newly discovered evidence case as whether the defendants’ attorneys had exercised due diligence in obtaining the allegedly “new” material
• upholding district court’s finding that defendant lacked due diligence where adverse witness testified at the beginning of trial
• defense counsel was made well aware of government’s theory of intent early in trial, yet did not investigate this theory
• discussing standard for review of motion for new trial
• defendants failed to seek continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).