United States v. Johnny Franklin, Jr., Also Known as Jack Culpepper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court properly considered the relevant § 3553(a
• noting that the judge who sentenced defendant after violating supervised release—the one who imposed the initial sentence—therefore “was aware of [defendant’s] history and characteristics”
• finding that knowledge of the relevant § 3553(a) factors could be “inferred from the record,” including through arguments from counsel
• observing that knowledge of the information relevant to the § 3553(a) factors may be inferred when the original sentencing judge presides over a revocation hearing
• noting that judge who presided over both original and revocation sentencing proceedings was aware of defendant's history and characteristics
• noting that the judge who presided over a defendant’s revocation sentencing also imposed the defendant’s initial sentence and was thus aware of the defendant’s history and characteristics

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).