United States v. Terron Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the standard of proof at sentencing is preponderance of the evidence
• considering, in assessing reasonableness of variance, argument that sentencing court’s reasoning was “internally inconsistent”
• va- eating and remanding a sentence based on internally inconsistent findings regarding the credibility of testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).