Fifth Circuit· 3/20/2000
United States v. Stiefel
Citations
- 207 F.3d 256
- 2000 WL 290165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant could not attack his current revocation sentence by seeking review of a prior sentence that he did not appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Duhé, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. MillerFifth Circuit· 2011-03-01· cited 365×
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2010-04-05· cited 184×
- United States of America v. Modesto GonzalezFifth Circuit· 2001-05-03· cited 171×
- United States v. McKinneyFifth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 66×
- United States v. MoodyFifth Circuit· 2001-12-21· cited 46×
- United States v. GonzalezFifth Circuit· 2001-06-12
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2010-05-06
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Darrell EarlyFifth Circuit· 1994-07-15· cited 344×
- United States v. Bernice H. ShanbaumFifth Circuit· 1994-01-03· cited 246×
- United States v. James William MathenaFifth Circuit· 1994-06-06· cited 144×
- United States v. HenryFifth Circuit· 1983-06-28· cited 97×
- United States v. Thomas Gerald HeadrickFifth Circuit· 1992-06-11· cited 72×
Other cases named United States v. Stiefel
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.