Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 3/20/2000

United States v. Stiefel

Citations

  • 207 F.3d 256
  • 2000 WL 290165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant could not attack his current revocation sentence by seeking review of a prior sentence that he did not appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Duhé, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.