Fifth Circuit· 3/20/2000
United States v. Stiefel
Citations
- 207 F.3d 256
- 2000 WL 290165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant could not attack his current revocation sentence by seeking review of a prior sentence that he did not appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Duhé, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.