United States of America v. Modesto Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may impose multiple consecutive terms of imprisonment when revoking multiple concurrent terms of supervised release
• observing that “supervised release . . . is still considered to be a component of the defendant’s total sentence,” citing section 3583(a) and noting its statement that supervised release may be included “‘as part of the sentence’”
• noting that dicta are nonbinding but may be persuasive
• noting, among other things, that the district court judge presiding over the defendant’s sentencing after revocation of supervised release was the same judge who imposed the initial sentence, and concluding that the district court implicitly considered the § 3553(a
• con- cluding that the district court had implicitly considered the § 3553(a) factors during revocation, based in part on the fact that the same court also had imposed the original sentence, where it explicitly considered several of the § 3553(a) factors
• supervised release is a component of defendant’s total sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).