United States v. Stefanik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court “was not compelled to give a definition [of the word ‘intimidate’] even when the jury requested one”
• “The ultimate standard is objective—whether a reasonable person would 5 understand the statement to be threatening.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• claim of instructional legal error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).