United States v. Alverio-Melendez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Brady violation where government did not turn over report of forensic analysis that was never conducted
• “[B]ecause no fingerprint analysis report existed, the government did not commit a Brady violation in failing to turn over such a report. The failure to create exculpatory evidence does not constitute a Brady violation.”
• “chose not to pursue forensic testing that could have exonerated Mr. Qualls”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).