Skip to main content
· 6/10/2009

United States v. Stalnaker

Citations

  • 571 F.3d 428
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12697
  • 2009 WL 1609075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s failure to explain her assertions or provide citations to the record or relevant law constituted waiver for failure to adequately brief
  • holding that the defendant’s failure to explain her assertions or provide citations to the record or relevant law constituted waiver for inadequate briefing
  • holding that the defendant’s failure to explain her assertions or provide citations to the record or relevant law constituted waiver for failure to adequately brief
  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a defendant’s 'motion for continuance
  • holding defendant attorney performing mortgage closing possessed special skill warranting enhancement for convictions arising out of mortgage fraud
  • noting that this behavior “suggests that the jury did not blindly convict on spillover evidence but instead gave each defendant and each count separate consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Smith, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.