· 6/10/2009
United States v. Stalnaker
Citations
- 571 F.3d 428
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12697
- 2009 WL 1609075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s failure to explain her assertions or provide citations to the record or relevant law constituted waiver for failure to adequately brief
- holding that the defendant’s failure to explain her assertions or provide citations to the record or relevant law constituted waiver for inadequate briefing
- holding that the defendant’s failure to explain her assertions or provide citations to the record or relevant law constituted waiver for failure to adequately brief
- holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a defendant’s 'motion for continuance
- holding defendant attorney performing mortgage closing possessed special skill warranting enhancement for convictions arising out of mortgage fraud
- noting that this behavior “suggests that the jury did not blindly convict on spillover evidence but instead gave each defendant and each count separate consideration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Smith, Owen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.