Sixth Circuit· 12/26/2007

United States v. Smith

Citations

510 F.3d 641
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29732
2007 WL 4482202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

distinguishing cases where there was “no information or evidence that suggested the vehicles in question contained contraband”
“When police have probable cause to believe that an automobile is forfeitable contraband, it may be seized from a public place without a warrant.”
first citing United States v. Lumpkin, 159 F.3d 983, 986 (6th Cir. 1998); then citing Smith v. Thornburg, 136 F.3d 1070, 1074 (6th Cir. 1998)
first quoting United States v. Lumpkin, 159 F.3d 983, 986 (6th Cir. 1998); and then citing Smith v. Thornburg, 136 F.3d 1070, 1074 (6th Cir.1998)
“When police have probable cause to believe that an automobile is forfeitable contraband, it may be seized from a public place without a warrant.”
first quoting United States v. Lumpkin, 159 F.3d 983, 986 (6th Cir. 1998); and then citing Smith v. Thornburg, 136 F.3d 1070, 1074 (6th Cir.1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Gibbons, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.