United States v. Troy Hockenberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when considering comprehensiveness of inventory list, officer’s use of discretion does not necessarily violate Fourth Amendment
• noting the distinction between “rely[ing] on unchallenged PSR findings to establish the existence of prior convictions” 8 and using PSR findings “to establish the specific nature of a conviction” (second emphasis added)
• Pennsylvania burglary statute divisible under Descamps because it “lists alternative elements in the statutory text”
• “[T]he district court’s categorization of [defendant’s] fleeing or attempting to elude conviction as a violent felony was plain error.”
• “In considering whether an offense is a violent felony, the Court must employ a categorical approach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).