Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 12/17/2001

United States v. Randy Graham

Citations

  • 275 F.3d 490
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26685
  • 2001 WL 1636805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming application of Section 3A1.4 over dissenting opinion arguing that enhancement is contrary to statute
  • noting the Supreme Court “has emphasized that no special exigency is required to conduct a warrantless search of an automobile when the car is mobile and the searching officer has probable cause to believe that fruits of a crime may be present in the automobile”
  • enhancement applied to member of domestic militia involved in plot to forcibly overthrow the government
  • “Because the crimes continued after the effective date of the amendment, the applica- tion of the adjustment does not present retroactivity problems.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Moore, Cohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

115 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Randy Graham

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.