United States v. Randy Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming application of Section 3A1.4 over dissenting opinion arguing that enhancement is contrary to statute
• noting the Supreme Court “has emphasized that no special exigency is required to conduct a warrantless search of an automobile when the car is mobile and the searching officer has probable cause to believe that fruits of a crime may be present in the automobile”
• enhancement applied to member of domestic militia involved in plot to forcibly overthrow the government
• “Because the crimes continued after the effective date of the amendment, the applica- tion of the adjustment does not present retroactivity problems.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Randy Graham

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Randy Graham
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-04-28· cited 33×