District of Columbia· 4/13/2012

United States v. Sitzmann

Citations

856 F. Supp. 2d 55
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54644
2012 WL 1345713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

deeming 37 evidence of prior high-volume drug trafficking relevant and probative of the defendant’s ability to traffic in large quantities of drugs
finding evidence of the defendant’s prior association with a co-conspirator and events leading up to a prior conviction were not intrinsic evidence of the charged conspiracy
where evidence is intrinsic to the crime charged, it is by definition not “other crimes” evidence and its admissibility is not determined under a Rule 404(b) analysis
prior bad acts admissible in conspiracy case if they explain “background, formation, and development of the illegal relationship” and “help the jury understand the basis for the co-conspirators’ relationship of mutual trust”
applying the two-step analysis described in Miller
applying the two-step analysis described in Miller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Sitzmann

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.