United States v. Dennis L. Mitchell, United States of America v. Paul B. Campbell, A/K/A Soup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly declined to allow expert linguistic testimony about the content of tape-recorded conversations before the jury
• holding that the district court properly declined to allow expert linguistic testimony about the content of tape-recorded conversations before the jury
• holding that district court did not err in precluding expert testimony on tape recorded conversations because “elucidat[ing] tape recorded conventions” is a “matter[] of general knowledge”
• noting that D.C. Circuit “ha[s] frequently upheld the admission of evidence regarding other drug transactions as relevant to intent in a charged drug transaction”
• noting that D.C. Circuit “ha[s] frequently upheld the admission of evidence regarding other drug transactions as relevant to [knowledge and] intent in a charged drug transaction.”
• affirming the district court’s decision to deny, as cumulative, the use of a witness’ videotaped statements to impeach his-testimony on a collateral matter because the court had permitted the defendant to use other material to impeach the witness regarding the same matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).