United States v. John Pascarella, Mark D'andrea, John Breheney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient evidence of bank’s FDIC insurance in part based on Defendant’s “bank statements stat[ing] that the bank was so insured”
• finding sufficient evidence of bank’s FDIC insurance in part based on Defendant’s “bank statements stat[ing] that the bank was so insured”
• a court may affirm a conviction for conspiracy where the evidence showed that defendant committed only two out of the three aims of the alleged conspiracy
• \Any conflict of interest that undermined [prior attorney's] ability properly to represent [defendant] disappeared once [prior attorney] no longer represented him.\
• a court may affirm a conviction for conspiracy where the evidence showed that defendant committed only two out of the three aims of the alleged conspiracy
• evidence of prior crimes, wrongs, or acts not admissible if “it is introduced for the sole purpose of showing defendant’s bad character . . . [or] is overly prejudicial under Fed. R. Evid. 403” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).