Fifth Circuit· 10/18/2004

United States v. Sipe

Citations

388 F.3d 471
2004 WL 2325496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remanding for a new trial based on withheld evidence that violated the government's Brady obligation
explaining the record was unclear whether witness’s “theft charge was a crime involving dishonesty”
appellate court reviewing Brady claim should defer to trial court’s factual findings “while reviewing the ultimate constitutional question afresh”
“The materiality of Brady material depends almost entirely on the value of the evidence relative to the other evidence mustered by the state.”
“To establish a Brady violation, a defendant must make three showings . . . .”
“To establish a Brady violation, a defendant must make three showings . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Higginbotham, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.