United States v. Sean Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court need not consider an argument raised “for the first time in a party’s objection to the magistrate judge’s recommendation”
• concluding that a district court “has discretion, but is not required” to consider new evidence when reviewing de novo a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations
• holding that a district court 1 may decline to consider new allegations presented for the first time in objections
• holding that a district court has 12 discretion to consider evidence and argument presented for the first time in an 13 objection to a magistrate’s recommendation
• concluding that it is within the district 15 court’s discretion whether to consider evidence presented for the first time in a party’s 16 objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation
• holding that “a district court has discretion, but is not required, to consider evidence presented 16 for the first time in a party’s objection to a magistrate judge’s recommendation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).