Skip to main content
· 8/8/1994

United States v. John Addison Ballis

Citations

  • 28 F.3d 1399
  • 41 Fed. R. Serv. 263
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21251
  • 1994 WL 411273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a proponent must inform the court of what he “intends to show by the evidence and why it should be admitted,” so that the appellate court can “adequately examine the propriety and harmfulness of the ruling”
  • “[E]xcluded evidence is sufficiently preserved for review when the trial court has been informed as to what counsel intends to show by the evidence and why it should be admitted . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Smith, Kent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.