Third Circuit· 10/8/2020
United States v. Scott Capps
Citations
- 977 F.3d 250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confining the § 2S1.1 aggravating-role analysis to money-laundering conduct and excluding all underlying mail-fraud conduct from that analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 1,281×
- Rosales-Mireles v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-06-18· cited 806×
- United States v. Craig B. SokolowThird Circuit· 1996-07-26· cited 136×
- Delaware v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1993-03-30· cited 88×
- United States v. AndersonSixth Circuit· 2008-05-27· cited 86×
- Shaw v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-12-12· cited 82×
- United States v. Robert Stinson, Jr.Third Circuit· 2013-08-21· cited 55×
- United States v. KeckTenth Circuit· 2011-07-01· cited 53×
- United States v. ByorsSecond Circuit· 2009-10-29· cited 24×
- United States v. Kenneth DouglasThird Circuit· 2018-03-15· cited 22×
- United States v. Israel SalgadoEleventh Circuit· 2014-03-14· cited 12×
- United States v. Brant RushtonSeventh Circuit· 2013-12-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.