Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/30/1993

Delaware v. New York

Citations

  • 507 U.S. 490
  • 113 S. Ct. 1550
  • 123 L. Ed. 2d 211
  • 1993 U.S. LEXIS 2553
  • 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 133
  • 61 U.S.L.W. 4295
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2325
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 3935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the contemporary concept of escheat bears a closer resemblance to bona vacantia and encompasses both real and personal property
  • reiterating that “States as sovereigns may take custody of or assume title to abandoned personal property as bona vacantia”
  • “To craft different rules for the novel facts of each case would generate ‘so much uncertainty and threaten so much expensive litigation that the States might find they would lose more in litigation expenses than they might gain in escheats.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, White, Blackmun, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Delaware v. New York

45 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.