United States v. Keck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting “Application Note 2(C) as governing only the applicability of adjustments on money-laundering convictions, as opposed to the offense calculations of other, related offenses”
• determining enhancement warranted “[b]ecause Keck used his daughter, a minor, to wire money” to effectuate a money-laundering scheme
• upholding exclusion of exhibits on the grounds of “relevancy, waste of time, and confusion of the jury”
• “In the context of electronically-stored data, the business record is the datum itself, not the format in which it is printed out for trial or other purposes.”
• “In the context of electronically-stored data, the business record is the datum itself, not the format in which it is printed out for trial or other purposes.”
• “In the context of electronically-stored data, the business record is the datum itself, not the format in which it is printed out for trial or other purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).