United States v. Santo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• review limited to determination of “prejudicial procedural error and whether the action was taken according to law and regulations, was supported by substantial evidence, had a rational basis and was in good faith”
• “The presumption is that government officials have acted in good faith in making their decisions. It takes almost irrefragable proof to overcome the presumption. The burden of doing so is on [the] plaintiff.”
• review is limited to a determination of “prejudicial procedural error and whether the action was taken according to law and regulations, was supported by substantial evidence, had a rational basis and was in good faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).